How to Live to 100: The Science of a Longer, Healthier Life
1 April 2026
Planning to live to 100 isn't just about making sure your money lasts. It's about making sure you have the health and financial freedom to enjoy the years you're funding.
There is no single amount of money you need to live to 100, because the answer depends on your spending, other income, investments and how long your money needs to last. A useful starting point is to divide your annual spending by a sustainable withdrawal rate; for a potentially 40-year retirement, a rate around 3.5% provides a conservative baseline, meaning $50,000 of annual spending would require roughly $1.43 million before considering other income, taxes and your individual circumstances.
How much money do you need to retire without running out? Is it $1 million? $2 million? More? The answer depends on how much you want to spend, when you stop working, what other income you have, how your investments perform and, perhaps most importantly, how long your money needs to last.
There is no single number that guarantees financial security for the rest of your life. But decades of research into retirement spending, combined with historical market data, give us some useful frameworks for working out what you might need. The 4% rule, made popular by the FIRE community (Financial Independence, Retire Early), is a good place to start. For a potentially 40-year retirement, however, a more conservative withdrawal rate may make sense.
At 100 Great Years, we use the principles behind the 4% rule, longer time horizons and historical backtesting to pressure-test retirement plans. The objective isn't to predict exactly what markets will do over the next 40 years. It's to understand how resilient your plan might be if the future doesn't look like the average.
And there's a second question that matters just as much: How much is enough?
Because the purpose of accumulating wealth isn't to accumulate the biggest possible number — it's to give you the freedom and security to spend your finite time on the things that matter to you.
The 4% rule is one of the most influential ideas in financial independence. It originated with financial planner William Bengen's 1994 analysis of historical US market data and was subsequently popularised by the Trinity Study. The basic idea is that a retiree could withdraw 4% of their portfolio in the first year of retirement, then increase that amount with inflation, and historically have had a good chance of making the portfolio last for a 30-year retirement.
The calculation is remarkably simple. If you want to spend $40,000 a year, you divide $40,000 by 4% (or multiply by 25), giving you a portfolio of $1 million. At $50,000 a year, you would need $1.25 million; at $60,000, $1.5 million.
The 4% rule became popular because it turns an intimidating retirement question into a straightforward calculation. But it is important to understand what the rule actually tells you. It is a historical rule of thumb based primarily on US market data and a retirement horizon of around 30 years. It isn't a guarantee, and it wasn't designed specifically for someone retiring at 55 or 60 and planning for the possibility of living to 100.
For someone with a potentially 40-year retirement, the question becomes more demanding.
For more detail, see Wealthspan: Safe withdrawal rates — how to make your money last as long as you do
The longer your retirement, the more opportunity there is for something to go wrong. A portfolio that survives a 25- or 30-year retirement may not survive a 40- or 45-year retirement under the same withdrawal assumptions.
Our analysis of historical data suggests approximately 3.7% for a 35-year retirement and 3.4–3.5% for a 40-year retirement. It also highlights an important limitation of the original 4% research: the historical analysis was based on US markets, whereas investors elsewhere have experienced different market returns and sequences of returns. A withdrawal rate around 3.5% is therefore a useful conservative starting point for someone planning a long retirement.
That difference between 4% and 3.5% is significant. But 3.5% shouldn't be treated as a magic number either. Your circumstances matter, as do your investment portfolio, other sources of income, spending flexibility, taxes and how long your money needs to last.
The useful lesson is not that everyone should use exactly 3.5%. It's that a longer retirement deserves a more conservative approach than simply applying the original 4% rule without thinking about the assumptions behind it.
One of the most important concepts in retirement planning is also one of the easiest to overlook: the order in which investment returns happen matters.
Imagine two people retiring with identical portfolios. Over the next 30 years, both portfolios achieve exactly the same average annual return. One retiree experiences a major market crash during the first few years of retirement, while the other experiences the same crash much later. Their outcomes can be very different.
The reason is that the first retiree is withdrawing money while their portfolio is falling. Selling investments to fund spending during a severe downturn leaves fewer assets available to participate in the eventual recovery. This is known as sequence-of-returns risk, and it is one of the reasons that a retirement projection based on a smooth assumed return can give a misleading impression of security.
You can't control the sequence of future market returns. You can, however, build a plan that is better able to cope with a bad sequence. Holding an appropriate cash reserve, maintaining some flexibility in discretionary spending, earning some income for longer or using a dynamic withdrawal strategy can all reduce the risk of being forced to sell investments at the worst possible time.
For more detail, see Retirement Planning: Sequence-of-returns risk — why market timing matters more than you think
Saving money is the foundation of building wealth, but if your goal is to support yourself over several decades, simply accumulating cash is unlikely to be enough. Inflation gradually reduces the purchasing power of money, which means that long-term wealth generally needs exposure to productive assets that have the potential to grow over time.
That doesn't mean trying to pick the next winning stock or predict the next market crash. For most people, a sensible long-term investment strategy is much less exciting: diversify across a broad range of assets, keep investment costs low and stay invested through the inevitable periods of market volatility.
Low-cost index funds can be a useful way of achieving broad diversification without paying the higher fees associated with many actively managed funds. Keeping costs low matters because investment fees compound over time just as investment returns do. A difference of a fraction of a percentage point may seem insignificant in a single year, but over several decades it can represent a substantial amount of lost wealth.
The objective isn't to build the cleverest portfolio. It's to build one that is diversified, inexpensive, understandable and robust enough that you can stick with it.
For more detail, start with Investing: The Fundamentals
Debt can be a significant drag on Wealthspan, particularly when you're paying high interest rates on credit cards, personal loans or other forms of consumer debt. Paying 20% interest on a balance is a difficult hurdle for any investment portfolio to overcome, particularly because investment returns are uncertain while the interest you owe is not.
That makes paying off expensive debt one of the clearest financial priorities for most people. But it's important not to treat every form of borrowing as equally bad. A mortgage is fundamentally different from high-interest consumer debt, particularly when it is secured against an affordable property and carries a relatively low interest rate.
The right question isn't simply whether you have debt. It's whether the debt makes sense in the context of your overall financial plan. Depending on your circumstances, paying down a mortgage, investing, or maintaining additional cash reserves may each be reasonable choices.
For more info, start with Debt: Avalanche vs. snowball — which method is right for you?
Building a substantial portfolio can take decades. A single major financial shock can undo much of that progress surprisingly quickly, which is why protecting your assets is an important part of Wealthspan.
Insurance is primarily about protecting against risks that would otherwise be difficult for you to absorb yourself. Depending on your circumstances, that might include life insurance, income protection, critical illness cover, home insurance or other forms of protection. The objective isn't to insure yourself against every conceivable inconvenience, but to make sure that a serious event doesn't permanently derail your financial plan.
The right amount and type of insurance will depend on your income, assets, dependants and existing financial commitments. Insurance should therefore be viewed as part of the broader financial plan rather than as a collection of unrelated products.
For more detail, see Insurance: Protecting what you’ve built
Your retirement number ultimately comes down to one of the simplest questions in personal finance: how much does your life cost?
This doesn't mean you need to track every coffee or turn your life into a spreadsheet. But you do need a realistic understanding of where your money goes and which parts of your spending are essential, discretionary or simply habitual.
Spending is particularly important because it affects Wealthspan in two directions. If you spend less while you're working, you have more money available to save and invest. But if you spend less in retirement, you also need a smaller portfolio to fund your lifestyle.
At a 3.5% withdrawal rate, reducing your annual spending by $5,000 reduces the portfolio required to support that spending by roughly $143,000. That means your spending decisions can be every bit as financially consequential as your investment returns.
The aim isn't to become miserly. It's to understand which spending genuinely adds value to your life and which spending has simply become your default.
For more info, start with Spending: Why knowing your number changes everything
One of the easiest ways to postpone financial independence is to allow your spending to rise every time your income does.
You receive a pay rise, so you move to a more expensive house. You get a promotion, so you upgrade the car. Your income increases again, and your holidays become more expensive. Before long, you may be earning substantially more than you were ten years ago without feeling materially more financially secure.
This is lifestyle inflation. It doesn't mean that increasing your spending is always wrong. If spending more genuinely makes your life better, it can be money well spent. The problem is when every increase in income automatically becomes a permanent increase in expenditure.
When your income rises, consider allowing some of the increase to improve your life while directing some towards your future financial freedom. That way, your standard of living can improve without your definition of "enough" constantly moving further away.
For more detail, see Spending: Lifestyle inflation — why more income doesn't always mean more progress
Your long-term investment portfolio shouldn't also have to serve as your emergency fund.
Unexpected expenses are inevitable. You might lose your job, need an expensive repair, face a period of ill health or simply encounter one of the many financial surprises that life produces. Without accessible cash, you may be forced to sell investments at an unfortunate time or take on expensive debt.
An emergency fund provides a buffer between those short-term surprises and your long-term financial plan. The right amount depends on your circumstances. Someone with secure employment and low fixed costs may need less than someone who is self-employed, has dependants or has substantial financial commitments.
For cash that doesn't need to be invested, it also makes sense to pay attention to the interest rate. A high-yield savings account can allow your emergency fund to remain accessible while earning a more competitive return than a conventional current account.
The key distinction is that your emergency fund has a different job from your investment portfolio. One provides liquidity and security; the other is designed to grow over the long term.
For more detail, start with Savings & Cash: The emergency fund — why three to six months of cash is non-negotiable
Investment returns aren't the same as the returns you actually get to keep. Over a lifetime of saving and investing, taxes can have a meaningful impact on how quickly your wealth grows and how much income your portfolio can ultimately provide.
That makes tax planning an important part of Wealthspan, not something to think about for the first time when you retire. In the US, that includes understanding the role of pensions, 401ks, IRAs and other tax allowances, as well as the different tax treatment of contributions, investment growth and withdrawals.
The details will depend on your circumstances, but the principle is straightforward: make use of the tax advantages available to you and understand how your decisions affect your after-tax wealth.
A dollar you don't have to pay in unnecessary tax can remain invested and compound for years.
For more detail, see Investing: Tax-efficient investing — making the most of your allowances
Fees deserve their own consideration because they are one of the few investment variables you can control.
You can't control whether markets rise or fall next year. You can't control inflation or the timing of the next recession. You can't control the sequence of returns you'll experience in retirement. But you can control how much you pay to invest.
Suppose two investors receive exactly the same gross investment returns, but one pays 0.2% a year in fees and the other pays 1.2%. The difference may not seem significant at first, but over several decades the additional costs can consume a substantial amount of the second investor's potential wealth.
This doesn't mean the cheapest investment is automatically the best. But it does mean that fees should be treated as a real drag on your Wealthspan, particularly when you're paying for services or investment strategies that don't provide corresponding value.
For more info, see Investing: The hidden cost of fees
Once you've built your financial plan, don't simply ask whether it works under one set of assumptions.
Ask how it performs when the assumptions are wrong.
What happens if you retire just before a major market crash? What if inflation remains high for several years? What if investment returns are disappointing during the first decade of retirement? What if you retire five years earlier than planned? What if you spend more than expected? What if you live to 100?
This is where historical backtesting and financial scenario modelling become useful.
Rather than assuming that your portfolio will grow by a smooth 6% or 7% every year, you can run a financial strategy through actual historical sequences of market returns. That allows you to see how a plan might have behaved during periods of severe market falls, high inflation, prolonged periods of weak returns and very different investment environments.
Backtesting doesn't predict the future. History will not repeat itself exactly, and past investment performance is not a guarantee of future returns. But it can provide a much more demanding stress test than a simple spreadsheet based on a single assumed annual return.
At 100 Great Years, we use historical backtesting to pressure-test the projection to age 100, because a plan that looks comfortable over a short horizon may reveal very different vulnerabilities when you ask it to survive for four decades.
Our Wealthspan widget also allows you to model different financial planning scenarios to see the impact on your portfolio: increase income by $500/month or reduce spending by $200/month and see how your projection changes. You can model a variety of WhatIf? life events - take a sabbatical, go part time, lose your job, test a market crash. If you want to model another scenario, just ask the AI Coach - it will walk you through the scenario and show you the impact on your actual numbers.
There is another variable that can dramatically change the amount of money you need: when you choose to stop working.
Financial independence doesn't necessarily mean never earning another dollar. You might continue working because you enjoy your career, start a business, work part-time or take on occasional projects. The important distinction is that you no longer have to work simply to pay the bills.
Even a modest amount of earned income can make a meaningful difference to a retirement portfolio, particularly during the early years when sequence-of-returns risk is greatest.
Working for another three years can mean three more years of saving and investing, three fewer years of portfolio withdrawals and potentially three additional years of compound growth. But the reverse is also true: those three years represent three years of your finite time.
Which brings us to a more important question.
Suppose you've calculated that you need $1.4 million to support your desired spending to age 100.
What happens when you reach $1.4 million?
You could keep working and aim for $1.5 million. Then £2 million. Perhaps £3 million. There is always another number.
There is nothing wrong with wanting to become wealthier. Financial security can make an enormous difference to your life, and having more resources gives you more choices. But there is a point at which the question changes from "How much do I need?" to "What am I accumulating this for?"
This is one of the ideas behind Your Money or Your Life by Vicki Robin and Joe Dominguez. Money represents more than a number in a bank account. It represents some of the time, energy and attention you have exchanged to earn it.
Your time is finite.
That doesn't mean you should stop working or stop accumulating wealth. It means that the trade-off is worth thinking about. Another year of work might give you greater financial security, or it might mean giving up a year that you could have spent travelling, raising a family, pursuing a passion, helping others or simply enjoying greater freedom.
The right answer will be different for everyone.
This is an important distinction.
Wealthspan isn't about being “rich.” It is about having enough financial resources to support the life you want for as long as you live.
That might mean retiring completely. It might mean working part-time. It might mean taking a sabbatical, starting a business, travelling more, spending time with family or simply having the freedom to say no to work that you don't want to do.
Financial independence isn't really about retirement.
It's about making work optional.
And once work becomes optional, the value of another pound needs to be considered alongside the value of another year of your life.
There is one final reason that we think about Wealthspan alongside Healthspan.
If you're fortunate enough to remain healthy and active into your 60s, 70s, 80s and beyond, financial security can help you make the most of those years. You may want to travel while you're physically capable of doing so. You may want to spend more time with family, pursue hobbies, learn something new or simply have the freedom to decide how you spend your days.
But the reverse is also true. If you build substantial wealth but spend your later years unable to do the things you hoped to do, some of the value of that financial security may be lost.
That's why we think about Healthspan and Wealthspan together.
Your Healthspan is the period in which you remain healthy and capable. Your Wealthspan is the period in which your financial resources can support the life you want. The objective is to create as much overlap between the two as possible.
The most important number in your financial plan may not be the amount you can accumulate.
It may be the amount at which money becomes sufficient to give you choices.
Enough to make work optional. Enough to withstand a market crash without panicking. Enough to support yourself if you live longer than expected. Enough to spend your healthy years doing things that matter to you.
That's the idea behind Wealthspan.
Not how much wealth you can accumulate, but how long your financial resources can support the life you want.
And if you are fortunate enough to live to 100, the objective isn't simply to have money left at the end.
It's to have had the freedom to use it well along the way.
Find out how you're doing across health and wealth
Get your free Health and Wealth scores in 5 minutes.
Take the free assessment →This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Always consider your personal circumstances and consult a qualified financial adviser before making investment decisions.